Legal Opinion

Blum v. Edenborn

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1920No. 7693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*10B. & H. BLUM VS WM. EDENBORN

No. 7693

Appeal from Civil District Court, Hon. Geo. H. Th'eard, Judge.

CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE, JUDGE.

This is a suit for the return of money paid by plaintiff to defendant on account of a promise of sale. It rosifiled November 20th, 1916.

The suit is brought upon the following contract:

$276.00 Shreveport, La., Mar.23d, 1916

For value received I or either of us, promise to pay to the order of William Edenborn at the office of his duly authorized agent L. M.Mc Farlin, in the L.R. and N. Building, Shreveport, La., (full consderation) Two Hundred and seventy-five Dollars for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maloney v. AschaffenburgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Southern Sawmill Co. v. DucoteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. Hoffman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  4. Page v. LoefflerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Doyle v. BrundredSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kels Kove of Lake Claiborne L L C v. EgnerDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API