Legal Opinion

Verizzo v. The Bank of New York Mellon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 21, 2017No. Case 2D15-2508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SALARIO, Judge..

We are again required to reverse a final judgment of foreclosure because of the plaintiffs failure to prove at trial the existence of standing at the inception of the case. See Stoltz v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 194 So.3d 1097, 1098 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“We are again-required to reverse a final judgment of foreclosure because of the plaintiffs failure to prove .at trial the existence of standing at inception of .the case.”). We remand for entry of an order of involuntary dismissal' under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(b).

The proceedings leading to the judgment on review…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Stone v. BankUnitedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Russell v. Aurora Loan Services, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Verizzo v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. GREEN EMERALD HOMES, L L C v. 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API