Verizzo v. Bank of New York
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
David Verizzo, pro se, appeals a final judgment of foreclosure entered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the Bank of New York, as successor trustee under Novastar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-3 (the Bank). Because the Bank’s summary judgment evidence was not timely served and filed and because a genuine issue of material fact remains, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The Bank filed a two-count complaint against Verizzo seeking to reestablish a lost promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage on real property. Included…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Githens v. BON SECOURS-MARIA MANORDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Mortgage Electronic Registration v. AzizeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Philogene v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Coastal Caribbean Corp. v. RawlingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- MacK v. Commercial Industrial Park, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Servedio v. US Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Miguel Tilus, Alta Tilus, Rose A. Joaseus and Kesner Joaseus v. AS Michai LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Lizio v. McCullomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Schmidt v. Deutsche BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.