Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 24, 2025No. 8/25Published

1Opinion of the Court

Diandre Goodrich v. State of Maryland, No. 8, September Term, 2025 SIXTH AMENDMENT – ARTICLE 21 OF MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS – MARYLAND RULE 4-215(e) – RIGHT TO COUNSEL – RIGHT TO SELF-REPRESENTATION – REQUEST TO DISCHARGE COUNSEL – INQUIRY Supreme Court of Maryland held that where trial court has been advised that defendant who is represented by counsel desires self-representation, court is required under Snead v. State, 286 Md. 122,

406 A.2d 98

(1979), to conduct inquiry to determine whether defendant truly wants to assert right to self-representation, i.e., whether defendant clearly and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Snead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API