Legal Opinion

Famous Manufacturing Co. v. Harmon

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1901No. 3,876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Porter Circuit Court; J. II. Gillett, Judge. Action for damages for personal injuries "by Henry Harmon against the Famous Manufacturing Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

It is assigned that the court erred in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the appellee’s amended complaint. The complaint to which the demurrer was addressed consisted of three paragraphs, all of which the court, by its ruling, attacked by the assignment of error, held sufficient. The trial was before the court, without a jury, and the court expressly based its finding for the appellee upon the first paragraph of the complaint. The appellant in its brief has stated objections to the second and *118third paragraphs, but has said nothing as to the sufficiency of the first paragraph. Under such a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Miller v. CoulterIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Whitney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Rinkenberger v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. v. Seal, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Bradford v. WeggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. DaeglingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Balph v. MagawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Ruck v. Milwaukee Brewery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API