Legal Opinion

Ohio Marble Co. v. Byrd

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1933No. 6203PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

John U. Byrd, appellee, filed his bill in equity against the Ohio Marble Company, appellant, in which he sought to recover certain amounts alleged to havé been earned by him as a salesman. Jurisdiction was based upon the statutory requirement as to amount and the allegation of diverse citizenship.

Appellee averred that he was a citizen of Kentucky, and that appellant was an Ohio corporation. There was a preliminary hearing upon appellant’s motion to dismiss the bill for lack of diversity of citizenship, appellant asserting that at the time suit was brought appellee was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Dibble v. . DimickNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Locher v. New York Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Hamilton v. C. L. Best Gas Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis & Tatera, Inc. v. Gray-Syracuse, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  2. Finsterwald-Maiden v. AAA South Central OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Atkinson v. New Britain MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  4. JAMES A. HEAD & COMPANY v. RollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Sooner Broadcasting Company v. GrotkopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API