Legal Opinion

Ruhm v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee

Decided April 10, 1895No. 3,035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by John Ruh.m against the United States.

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, District Judge.

This suit is brought under the act of congress of March 3, 1887 (24 Stat. 505), to enforce certain claims against the United States. Claimant was district attorney of the United States from May, 1889, to February 1, 1894, for the Middle distiict of Tennessee. The claims are for expenses incurred and special services rendered during his term of office. The fees sued for are alleged to be for services performed under the direction of the attorney general, not connected with the duties of the office of the district attorney, and not, therefore, covered by the salary and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibson v. PetersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. ShieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Schloss v. HewlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Carrick v. LámarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. United States v. BashawSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. AdyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. United States v. DenisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  3. United States v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API