Legal Opinion

Carrick v. Lámar

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1886No. 1191PublishedCited by 13 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE' THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. This was an application to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia for a mandamus to require the Secretary of the Interior to cause a survey to be made of an island in the Mississippi opposite St. Louis. Mandamus being refused, a writ of error was sued out. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. • •'

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field

This case comes before us on writ of error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The petitioner applied for a writ of mandamus against the Secretary of the Interior to , order the survey of Arsenal Island, which is situated in the Mississippi River, opposite the City of St. Louis. He represents that he is the head of a family, over twenty-one years of age, and a citizen of the United States; that on the first of September; 1883, he made a settlement in person on the island; that it contains about 230 acres, is ten feet above high-water .mark, is not subject to overflow, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. United States Ex Rel. Goodrich v. GuthrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Litchfield v. The Register and ReceiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. United States v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Akin v. Butler Street Foundry & Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Clackamas County, Ore. v. McKayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Robinson v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Kirwan v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API