Tesra Co. v. Holland Furnace Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant is a California corporation, and was engaged in the manufacture and sale of a device consisting of a steam radiator, heating unit and switch operated by means of a thermostat. It spent large sums of money in marketing this product with some success. Appellee, a corporation engaged in the manufacture of hot-air furnaces in Holland, Mich., entered into a written agreement with the appellant on March 15, 1928, for the purchase of the contrivance. The agreement contemplated a formal contract to be executed later between the parties, and required the appellant to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Waterson, Berlin & Snyder Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. American Bell Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shatterproof Glass Corporation v. Libbey-Owens-Ford CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Prestole Corporation v. Tinnerman Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Eastman Oil Well Survey Corp. v. Lane-Wells Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Preferred Acc. Ins. v. RhodenbaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. American Ore Reclamation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.