Legal Opinion

People v. Espinoza

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1977No. Crim. 29693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

After a jury trial, Joseph Espinoza was found guilty of assault with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a).) The jury further found that the allegation that he used a firearm pursuant to Penal Code sections 12022.5 and 1203.06 was true.

Facts:

Appellant Espinoza fired a shot at Roddrick Devious Johnson and struck Johnson in the arm. Appellant’s defense was that he was seeking to arrest Johnson on a fleeing felon theory; that is, he believed Johnson had brought harm to Espinoza’s employees, had robbed Espinoza’s place of business, and had broken glass at that location.

Espi…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. PiorkowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. WildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. People v. VaronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. People v. CoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API