Legal Opinion

Canary Oil Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas

Decided September 22, 1909No. 533PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by the Canary Oil Company against the Standard Asphalt & Rubber Company. Defendant having removed the case to the federal court, plaintiff moved to remand.

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

The facts necessary to a decision of the controversy presented by this motion are these:

The plaintiff commenced its action at law in Montgomery county, this state, and procured the issuance and levy of a writ of attachment against the property of the defendant. In itsn petition plaintiff makes the following allegations as to its incorporation and the incorporation and citizenship of the defendant:

“That it now is, and was at all of the times hereinafter mentioned, a corporation created, organized, and existing under and by virtue of an act of Congress approved February…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. United States v. PridgeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Utter v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alabama v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1925
  2. Boyd v. Great Western Coal & Coke Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API