Legal Opinion

Cressman Tubular Products Corp. v. Kurt Wiseman Oil & Gas, Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 23, 2010No. 14-08-01039-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice.

This is a double appeal of a case in which multiple theories of liability were asserted against four defendants for damages caused by the sale of goods for use in an oil well. After the defendant found liable for 99% of the plaintiffs’ damages filed for bankruptcy protection, the trial court severed those claims from this case and entered judgment requiring all of the plaintiffs’ damages and attorney’s fees to be paid by the defendant that the jury found to be 1% responsible. On appeal, that defendant contends that all of the plaintiffs’ damages sound in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Page Petroleum, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flying J Inc. v. Meda, Inc. D/B/A AAA Auger, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  2. Beltran v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  3. GB Tubulars, Inc. v. Union Gas Operating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Burnett v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. George E. Rhymes Jr. and Rhymes Industrial Filtration & Consulting, LLC v. Filter Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API