Legal Opinion
JOHN DOE (1) v. Archdiocese of Denver
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 7, 2006No. CIV. 05CV02235LTBCBS, CIV. 05CV02236LTBCBS, CIV. 05CV02237LTBCBS, CIV. 05CV02238LTBCBS, CIV. 05CV02239LTBGBS, CIV. 05CV02620LTBCBS, CIV. 05CV02622LTBCBS, CIV. 06CV00157LTBCBS, CIV. 06CV00158LTBCBS, CIV. 06CV00159LTBCBS, CIV. 06CV00160LTBCBSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
These cases, removed here from Colorado courts and consolidated for the purpose of resolving the plaintiffs’ motions to remand, present the narrow question whether claims arising out of neutral, state law of general applicability create a contested and substantial federal issue sufficient to establish jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 where, notwithstanding the existence of ecclesiastical recourse, secular norms govern the conduct of which the plaintiffs complain. For the reasons stated below, I find and conclude that no…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- RCHFU, LLC v. Marriott Vacations Worldwide CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Woodly v. Baltimore Gas & ElectricDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024