Legal Opinion

Woodly v. Baltimore Gas & Electric

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 6, 2024No. 1:24-cv-01813Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ARETHA RACHELLE WOODLY, Plaintiff, * v. 2 Civ. No. JKB-24-01813 BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC, etal, * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * te * MEMORANDUM On July 17, 2024, this Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause by July 31, 2024, why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 11.) The July 31 deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has failed to make any response. Because the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this matter, Plaintiff's Complaint…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API