Johnson v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KOONTZ, J.
Lacy Hughes Johnson (Johnson) appeals his conviction in a bench trial on a charge of breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, Code § 18.2-92. Johnson asserts that Code § 18.2-92 requires that at the time of entry by an accused, the dwelling must be physically occupied. Johnson *443further asserts that the evidence was insufficient to show that he broke and entered the home or that he did so with the requisite intent to commit a misdemeanor. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Johnson’s conviction.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Johnson was indicted on a charge of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rollston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Branch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Speight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- People v. QuattlebaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Rashad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Commonwealth v. MitchellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.