Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 31, 1994No. Record No. 1069-92-3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KOONTZ, J.

Lacy Hughes Johnson (Johnson) appeals his conviction in a bench trial on a charge of breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, Code § 18.2-92. Johnson asserts that Code § 18.2-92 requires that at the time of entry by an accused, the dwelling must be physically occupied. Johnson *443further asserts that the evidence was insufficient to show that he broke and entered the home or that he did so with the requisite intent to commit a misdemeanor. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Johnson’s conviction.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Johnson was indicted on a charge of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rollston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  4. Branch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Speight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. People v. QuattlebaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  4. Rashad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. MitchellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API