Legal Opinion

Carmel v. Lunney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 31, 1986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

In March 1980, plaintiff was subpoenaed by the Attorney-General to give testimony at a hearing held pursuant to the Martin Act (General Business Law art 23-A). The purpose of the hearing was to investigate possible fraudulent or deceptive practices in the promotion and sale of participating interests in a limited partnership known as Michael Starbuck, Inc. and Associates, offered to the public through various stock brokerage firms. Plaintiff, a licensed securities broker, sold such interests to various persons through his employer, the firm of Fittin, Cunningham…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gibson v. TrantTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lawrence v. Bingham, Greenebaum, Doll, L.L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. McCarthy v. Pedersen & HouptAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Smith v. Public Def. Serv. for the DCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Rosenberg v. ShostakMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API