Matter of Anonymous
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
Respondent here was charged by verified complaint for disciplinary action with violating Rule 7.3(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. The charge arises out of an incident wherein Respondent sent a written solicitation to an individual who had shortly beforehand been charged with driving while intoxicated. The Disciplinary Commission and the Respondent have tendered for this Court’s approval a statement of circumstances and conditional agreement for discipline, therein agreeing that Respondent should be privately reprimanded. Further, Respondent has…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
4Cited by1 opinion
- Fink v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997