Legal Opinion

Harr v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1957No. 0-484PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

It appears from the papers filed herein that appellant is attempting, pro se, to submit an appeal to this court. He has, however, failed to file an assignment of errors and otherwise comply with Eule 2-6 of this court, 1954 Edition. Without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon this court and the attempted appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. PelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCrary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hogan v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Watson v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Edwards v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Posey v. MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API