Legal Opinion

Fontaine v. Boyd

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 21, 2011No. C.A. No. WC-2007-0794Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

This Court is asked in this action to determine whether a claim of negligence by one skier against another skier for injuries sustained when the two friends collided while skiing recreationally is barred as a matter of law by the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk under New Hampshire law. Defendant Deborah Boyd has filed a motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff Andree Fontaine, seeking to bar Plaintiff's negligence claim against her on the grounds that she owed no duty to protect Plaintiff from the inherent risk of such a collision. For the reasons set forth in this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walls v. Oxford Management Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Cheong v. AntablinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Peter Smith v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., T/d/b/a Seven Springs Ski ResortCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Delta Airlines, Inc. v. NearySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. Manchenton v. Auto Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API