Legal Opinion
Nautilus Ins. Co. v. 200 Christian St. Partners, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 30, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NOS. 18-1364; 18-1545PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. Barclay Surrick, District Judge
Presently before the Court are Nautilus Insurance Co.'s Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Nautilus I MJP, ECF No. 14; Nautilus II MJP, ECF No. 41.)1 In each of these Motions, Nautilus seeks a declaratory judgment that it does not have a duty to defend and indemnify 200 Christian Street Partners, Virgil Procaccino, and Arthur Elwood (collectively, "Defendants") in two underlying lawsuits. We will deny Nautilus's Motions. Nautilus has a duty to defend Defendants in the underlying actions because the plaintiffs in the underlying actions sufficiently allege products-related tort claims such…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Ramara Inc v. Westfield Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Election Systems & Software, LLC v. Smartmatic USA CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. BERKLEY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020