Legal Opinion

United States v. Ricardo Arredondo

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2003No. 02-1394PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Chief Judge.

The district court held Ricardo Arredon-do in criminal contempt of court after finding that he gave fabricated evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel to support his petition for postconviction relief from a federal sentence for drug trafficking. Mr. Arredondo appeals from this contempt conviction and from the district court’s accompanying denial of relief from Ms drug sentence. For the reasons explained below, we reverse the conviction for contempt but affirm the denial of postconviction relief.

I

Arredondo was convicted in 1990 of three counts of distribution…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Ricardo Arredondo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carrion v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Crawford v. Tribeca Lending Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Shirley RangolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Dasher v. Attorney General, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Reginald Desmond Wallace v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API