Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Trinity Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1991No. Nos. 86-2236, 86-2309PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

Before MCKAY, BARRETT and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges. SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

In 1989, we affirmed judgments rendered in favor of Michael L. Doyle against Trinity Savings and Loan Association, now Bright Banc Savings Association,1 against TSL Service Corporation and STM Mortgage Company, both now Bright Mortgage Company,2 and against the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Doyle had sought damages and cancellation of a note and real estate mortgage because of fraudulent alteration of the note. See Doyle v. Trinity Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 869 F.2d 568 (10th Cir.1989). All…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goss v. Trinity Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Farmers Insurance v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael L. Doyle v. Trinity Savings and Loan Association, Tsl Service Corporation, Stm Mortgage Company, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Michael L. Doyle v. Trinity Savings and Loan Association, Tsl Service Corporation, Stm Mortgage Company, and Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API