Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. Citizens Hotel Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1964No. 16530PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

The material question to be determined is whether the owner of the fee interest in and under a public street (to its center), who has for many years used an underground portion thereof with knowledge and express or implied consent by the incorporated city possessing the street easement, may be subjected to liability for the payment to the city of a rental charge for its continued use.

The trial court determined that the owner, who as plaintiff sought an injunction and declaratory judgment, was not obliged to pay the rent sought to be charged and granted injunction against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Mission v. PopplewellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sears v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Town of Refugio v. StrauchTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Tacoma Safety Deposit Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Ryerson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. City of Lubbock v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  4. City of Seattle v. Samis Land Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API