Legal Opinion
Stephen M. Garrison v. Case Hoffman, et al.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 4, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01614Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION STEPHEN M. GARRISON, CASE NO. 3:24 CV 1614 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II CASE HOFFMAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER Introduction and Procedural Background Currently pending before the Court are several motions filed by pro se Plaintiff Stephen M. Garrison. See Docs. 51, 53, 54, 55, 56. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motions for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint (Docs. 51, 54), grants Plaintiffs’ Motions for Leave of Court to Submit a Second Set of Interrogatories…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Prison Litigation Reform ActCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.