Legal Opinion

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 2, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

It does not appear from the record that the defendant was offered an opportunity in open court to be heard upon the question as to whether he had violated the conditions upon which the original judgment was suspended. Neither is there evidence or finding of fact to the effect that any of said conditions had been violated.

The exception of the defendant to the judgment appealed from is sustained. S. v. Hardin, 183 N. C., 815, 112 S. E., 593; S. v. Phillips, 185 N. C., 614, 115 S. E., 893; S. v. Gooding, 194 N. C., 271, 139 S. E., 436.

Costs constitute no part of the punishment of the defendant.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . CrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. State v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. State v. . GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. SkypeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Wyatt v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. State v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API