Legal Opinion

Thomas v. First Interstate Bank of Arizona, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 30, 1996No. 2 CA-CV 96-0061PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

In this wrongful death action against First Interstate Bank, the issue on appeal is whether the comparative fault statute, A.R.S. § 12-2506, permits the allocation of fault between an allegedly negligent defendant, appellant First Interstate Bank, and a non-party (Patrick Slay), who commits a criminal act of murder. On plaintiffs’ Motion for Declaratory Judgment for interpretation of the statute, the trial court entered a formal judgment, certified under Ariz. R. Civ. P. 54(b), 16 A.R.S., granting plaintiffs’ motion and striking Slay as a non-party at fault. We conclude…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blazovic v. AndrichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wareing v. FalkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. McCann v. LesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Bhinder v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. McKillip v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Rosner v. Denim & Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API