Legal Opinion

Passaic Nat. Bank v. Commercial Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 3, 1919No. 3241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Bill by the Passaic National Bank, the Rutherford National Bank, the Savings Investment & Trust Company, and others against the Commercial National Bank, Tucker K. Sands, and others. Prom a decree dismissing the bill as to the named defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, ■filed a bill in equity in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, *235seeking a rescission of the purchase of certain securities, amounting to $95,000 and a money decree for the amount invested therein, with interest and costs. The facts, as alleged in the bill, are substantially as follows:

In 1910 a firm known as F. Mertens’ Sons were the owners of a large amount of mountain lands in the state of Maryland, from which timber had been cut. This firm conceived the idea of converting the land into a vast orchard scheme. To this end…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  2. Grady v. EasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Turner v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API