Linnemann v. Kirchner
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — F. D. Letts, Judge. Appellee has verdict and judgment against the said estate, on a claim that C. B. Kirchner, in his lifetime, made verbal contract to pay for the support and education of the said wards of appellee. Hence this appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
I. There are 92 “errors relied on for reversal,” and 61 brief points. The two fill 56 pages of print. *339The argument of the appellant upon these covers 118 pages; the reply brief, 31 pages. This is not said by way of criticism. We have no desire to interfere arbitrarily with the conception that counsel have of their duty to their client, nor with their method of presentation. It is said to explain why it is impossible, within the reasonable limits of an opinion, to go into a detailed consideration of all the points raised,- — said to justify our limiting consideration to what seems to us to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wormley v. HamburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Davis v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Ivers v. IversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Birge v. RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Reard v. FreidenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
3Cited by20 opinions
- Isaacs v. DeutschSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Stookesberry v. BurgherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Haimes v. SchonwitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Turnis v. BallouSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.