Clements v. State

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

1. There is ample evidence, besides that of the female, to corroborate her statement regarding the offense of sodomy. We see no benefit to be gained by reiterating the sordid evidence here. The brief of evidence is approved by the trial court. The assignment of error as to the general grounds is not meritorious.

2. Special ground 1 contends substantially as follows: “Because the verdict is contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity, rendered so by the verdict of the jury, in that said verdict made res adjudicata the question of force, and unless there was…