Legal Opinion

Woodard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 19, 1955No. 35505PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. “Generally, when a party permits proceedings to be had, in the progress of his case, without making any objection, the court will hold him to have waived the objection, and will not relieve him against the consequences oí the proceeding, to which he did not object at the proper time. Dudley’s Reps. 209; Ga. Decisions, part 2, 131; 2 Kelly 281; 9 Ga. 359; 22d Ga. 24, 330; 27 Ga. 378; 36 Ga. 599; 37 Ga. 102.” Haiman v. Moses, 39 Ga. 708 (3), 712.

2. Where, under an application of the foregoing rule, it appears that, upon the trial of one charged with the possession of non-tax-paid whisky, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Harrison v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  3. Haiman & Brother v. Moses & GerrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  4. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Broznack v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Locklear v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Grimes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API