Mississippi Department of Transportation v. B & G Outdoor
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
BRIDGES, C.J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This ease involves an appeal of the judgment of the Tunica County Special Court of Eminent Domain, in which the trial judge ruled in favor of B & G Outdoor (B & G). The trial court required the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) to pay the cost of a replacement billboard for B & G after the land upon which the billboard was situated was taken for a highway project. MDOT appeals that ruling raising the following issue:
I. THE COURT ERRED IN CONSTRUING THE MISSISSIPPI RELOCATION ASSISTANCE LAW TO REQUIRE THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Evans v. Boyle Flying Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Zeigler v. ZeiglerMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
- Antonio Pou Pacheco, D/B/A Torrefaccion Mi Tacita, Pou De Pou, Ilba Maida, and Their Conjugal Partnership v. Carlos Soler Aquino, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. RivesMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- V.W. v. Agency for Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- V.W. v. Agency for Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017