Legal Opinion

Mississippi Department of Transportation v. B & G Outdoor

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 13, 1998No. 97-CA-00660 COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIDGES, C.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This ease involves an appeal of the judgment of the Tunica County Special Court of Eminent Domain, in which the trial judge ruled in favor of B & G Outdoor (B & G). The trial court required the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) to pay the cost of a replacement billboard for B & G after the land upon which the billboard was situated was taken for a highway project. MDOT appeals that ruling raising the following issue:

I. THE COURT ERRED IN CONSTRUING THE MISSISSIPPI RELOCATION ASSISTANCE LAW TO REQUIRE THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evans v. Boyle Flying Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Zeigler v. ZeiglerMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Antonio Pou Pacheco, D/B/A Torrefaccion Mi Tacita, Pou De Pou, Ilba Maida, and Their Conjugal Partnership v. Carlos Soler Aquino, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. RivesMississippi Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. V.W. v. Agency for Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. V.W. v. Agency for Health Care AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API