Legal Opinion

Surles v. McLaurin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1913No. 8516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before C. J. Ramage, special Judge, Dillon, November, 1912. Action by Allen Surles against D. McLaurin et at. Defendant McLaurin appeals. 3 Rich. Eq. 271, 384; 1 Rich. Eq. 411; 2 Strob. Eq. 174; 13 S. C. 115; 65 S. C. 345; 67 S. C. 307; 48 S. C. 440.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods. In this action to enforce the specific performance of a contract to purchase a tract of land, the defendant, McLaurin, alleged that the plaintiff, Allen Surles, had only a life estate in the land, and, therefore, could 'not perform his contract to convey a perfect title in fee simple. Allen Surles derived title under the following clause of the will of A. B. Surles: “To my beloved son, Allen Surles, I give, devise and bequeath the lands known as my Clark place, bounded north by T. P. Squires, east by Little Pee Dee River, south by R.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woodle v. Hl Tilghman, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  2. Smoak v. McClureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Farmer v. CorleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Bethea v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Strother v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API