Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Geigle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 9, 1996No. 18074-0-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

In this dissolution case, the husband appeals the trial court’s division of property. We affirm.

In 1972, Wallace and Elaine Geigle were married. According to their later decree of dissolution, Wallace already had three-and-a-half years of credited federal employment. In 1974, Wallace went to work for the Veterans Administration Hospital in Vancouver, Washington. In 1983, Wallace ceased working at the hospital after suffering a back injury, apparently while on the job. The same year, according to his brief, "he was found to be totally disabled from employment by the United States Department of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Leisure v. LeisureIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Arnold v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Barros v. BarrosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conner v. ConnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In re the Marriage of PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Gersten v. GerstenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. In Re Marriage of CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. In re the Marriage of AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API