Legal Opinion
United States v. Millan-Colon
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 30, 1993No. S9 91 Cr. 685 (SWK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
On March 8, 1993, trial commenced in the above-captioned heroin conspiracy case. On April 16, 1993, the Court declared a mistrial. Defendants Vincent Basciano, Alfred V. Bot-tone, Sr., Alfred Bottone, Jr., Anthony Bot-tone, Jose Colon, Myles Coker, Noel Melendez, Eric Millan-Colon, John O’Rourke, Ralph Rivera, Samanta Torres and Larry Weinstein now move to (1) preclude retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment; (2) dismiss the indictment based on “outrageous * Governmental conduct”; (3) delay the retrial pending further…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Eric Millan and Ralph RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Velez v. People of the State of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. MillanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MillanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Millan-ColonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.