Legal Opinion
United States v. Deigert
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 12, 1990No. Nos. 89-5184 to 89-5186 and 89-5455PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendants were found guilty of various counts in an indictment alleging a drug conspiracy and substantive distribution violations transpiring from 1981 until March 1988. Each argues that his or her individual sentence violated the ex post fac-to clause of the constitution because it was fashioned according to the federal Sentencing Guidelines and included punishment for conduct occurring before November 1, 1987, when the Guidelines became effective. We have recently considered and rejected the ex post facto argument in this circuit. See United States v. Sheffer, 896 F.2d 842 (4th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Francis BayerleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Cheryl GoffCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Roy David SummersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. ShefferCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Nelson Guerrero, Cesar Rivera and Anthony MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Mirna Rivera, United States v. Robert AdamoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Marva Headley, A/K/A "Brenda"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Marius CanoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.