Legal Opinion
Arce v. O'CONNELL
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 2006No. 02 Civ. 1709(RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants James O’Connell, Joseph J. Costello, Roseann Mahoney, David Napoli, Skip Hughes, Dwight Hunt, Edward R. Donnelly, and M. Kearney (collectively, “Defendants”), all employees of the New York Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., against inmate plaintiff George Arce (“Arce” or “Plaintiff’). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted, and Aree’s complaint is dismissed in its entirety.
Prior Proceedings
Arce commenced this action on March 5, 2002…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alster v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Smith v. MastersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Hamilton v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Irving H. Picard v. RAR Entrepreneurial Fund, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- McCray v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021