Legal Opinion

Blair v. Durham

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1943No. 9281PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

January 31, 1943, pursuant to the verdict of a jury, appellee was awarded a judgment against appellants in the sum of $6,-500.00 and costs. The judgment was silent on the question of interest.

April 9, 1943, this court affirmed the judgment (134 F.2d 729), and our mandate issued on June 11, 1943. The mandate also was silent on the question of interest. September 23, 1943, the attorney for appellants requested the clerk of this court to submit to the court the question of whether the court’s mandate was to be construed as prohibiting the collection of interest on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States v. EliasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  2. Bricklayers' Pension Trust Fund v. TaiariolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Panagiotis Kotsopoulos v. Asturia Shipping Co., S.A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and the S/t Mercury, Her Engines, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. DuVoisin v. Anderson (In Re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API