Legal Opinion

Gamble v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1946No. 23291Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed a very pointed, concise and forceful motion for rehearing, in which he sets out that his Bill of Excep tion No. 7 “shows that this negro was questioned by various officers in relays of two at a time, from about 5 o’clock on Saturday afternoon until about 5 o’clock the following Sunday afternoon, and that there were only slight intermissions for the appellant to have a bite to eat, or relax.” The writer entertains the view that such conduct, if indulged, could be sufficient to break the resistance of the accused and wring…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Cavazos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Abston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API