Sunrise Properties, Inc. v. Jamestown Urban Renewal Agency
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioners contend that respondent’s condemnation of their property did not serve a public use, benefit or purpose. We disagree. EDPL 207 is a summary proceeding in which the scope of review is expressly limited to, among other relevant factors, whether a public use, benefit or purpose will be served by the proposed acquisition (Matter of Waldo’s, Inc. v Village of Johnson City, 74 NY2d 718, 720; Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 67 NY2d 400, 418). If an adequate basis for a determination…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Yonkers Community Development Agency v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Long Island Rail Road v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Long Island Rail Road Co. v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Jamestown v. Leevers Supermarkets, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Court St. Dev. Project, LLC v. Utica Urban Renewal AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Bergen Swamp Preservation Society v. Village of BergenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Vitucci v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- West 41st Street Realty LLC v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.