Legal Opinion

United States v. Levasseur

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 29, 1985No. 85 Crim 143PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GLASSER, District Judge:

Thomas Manning and Carol Manning, two of the seven defendants named in this case, have moved this Court for an order suppressing certain physical evidence seized from a house they occupied at 1885 Dodgeville Road, Jefferson, Ohio. A hearing was held on October 2, 1985. The findings of fact and conclusions of law that follow must be read against the background of the indictment and the orders thus far issued determining a variety of other pretrial motions.

The defendants have been charged in a twelve count indictment alleging a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. United States v. Raymond Levasseur, Carol Ann Manning, Thomas William Manning, Barbara Curzi-Laaman, Richard Charles Williams, Jaan Karl LaamanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Jerrell HeathCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Laura WhitehornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. LevasseurDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API