Legal Opinion

Tartaglione v. Shaw's Express, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 14, 1992No. 89 Civ. 5671 (KMW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge.

Defendant Shaw’s Express, Inc. (“Defendant Shaw”) and Defendant Putnam Transfer & Storage Company (“Defendant Putnam”) move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants Shaw and Putnam.

BACKGROUND

On December 8, 1987, Plaintiff Peter Tartaglione was operating a motor vehicle on the Cross-Bronx Expressway in the Bronx, New York, when he collided with a truck owned by Vincent Kish and operated by Mark McFane.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Andrew Chen and Chen Printing and Supply Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schramm v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  2. Jean C. Graham v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Toledo v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Graham v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  5. Kavulak v. Laimis Juodzevicius, A.V. Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API