Legal Opinion

Delhi Estates, Ltd. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. 92-1367PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is another appeal involving the determination of the true value of subsidized real property. We affirm the decision of the BTA.

The parties to the appeal apparently concede the applicability of Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 16, 523 N.E.2d 826, and related cases, but each levels criticism at the opponent’s appraisal.

The BTA stated: “[T]he income approach is the most appropriate method of valuation to use in the calculation of value on an income-producing property.”

The BTA found:

“Specifically, with regard to valuation of subsidized housing, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Crow v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Canton Towers, Ltd. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Loveland Pines v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Columbus Ctiy Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Lutheran Social Servs. of Cent. Ohio Village Hous., Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Penns Grove Gardens Ltd. v. Penns Grove BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API