State ex rel. Wyant v. Wyant
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Buskirk, C. J.,
dissented from so much of the opinion as held that the appellant became the surety of his co-administrator : “ He executed the bond as a principal, and not as a surety, and he can not be held liable as a surety.” After quoting the language, in part, of section 19 of the decedents’ estates act,. the learned Judge added : “ The statute imperatively requires a separate bond for each executor or administrator. The bond in suit not being a good common-law bond, and not being authorized by statute, is illegal and void.”
It is very evident, we think, that the attention of the court was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Railsback v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Braxton v. State ex rel. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Miller v. McAllisterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Fuller v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.