Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clubb v. Hetzel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1948No. 37,030Published

1DissentHoch, J.

I am unable to concur in the opinion in this case, which fell to my lot to write for the court.

The fundamental question is whether the shipper, having knowingly chosen, in writing, the cheaper transportation rate, based on a limited recovery in case of loss, may, after the loss has occurred, repudiate his written agreement and recover the full value to which the higher rate would have entitled him. That result should not be reached except for the most compelling reasons.

I find no ambiguity in appellee’s letter of July 7, 1946, quoted in the opinion. It seems perfectly clear to me that he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Caten v. Salt City Movers & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Girard Insurance & Trust Co v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. McCandlessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. White v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API