Legal Opinion
Blodgett v. Hovey
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the' opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
On the 22d day of August, 1889, plaintiff wrote to defendants as follows:
“Gentlemen: We will order the Muskegon Booming Go-to deliver you 30,000 of our logs, marked 179/ or as many aB it will take to make 3,000,000 feet of merchantable piece stuff; you to saw same, and dead pile lumber on your dock, at $1.50 per M. feet. We will also sell you the lumber from above logs at the following prices, viz., $8.62£ per M. feet for merchantable lumber; $4.50 per M. feet for culls, 6 and 8 feet. Terms, 60 days from date of shipment, which shall be made promptly as fast as cargo is cut and dead piled on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lingham v. EgglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Jenkinson v. Monroe Bros. & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- People ex rel. Holmes v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- H. M. Tyler Lumber Co. v. CharltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- GMAC Business Credit, L.L.C. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Blodgett v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Orleans International Inc v. ALTERNA CAPITAL SOLUTIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024