Legal Opinion

Laurence Gluck & Sandra Prusock v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 26, 2020No. 3435-19Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2020-66

UNITED STATES TAX COURT LAURENCE GLUCK AND SANDRA PRUSOCK, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 3435-19. Filed May 26, 2020. Bob G. Goldberg, for petitioners. Thomas J. Kerrigan, Theodore R. Leighton, and Brian E. Peterson, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION LAUBER, Judge: This case arises from a determination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS or respondent) that petitioners were not permitted to defer capital gain as part of a like-kind exchange. On the basis of that conclusion the IRS determined a deficiency in tax and an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Breman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. Normac, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  4. Charlotte's Office Boutique, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Elizabeth N. Callaway v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API