Legal Opinion

Charlotte's Office Boutique, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2005No. 04-71325PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

On its face, this is an appeal by Charlotte’s Office Boutique, Inc., from the Tax Court’s determination that its royalty payments to Charlotte Odell, one of its two shareholders, were actually wages and that appellant was liable for employment taxes on those wages and penalties. This appeal, however, also raises a challenge to the Tax Court’s jurisdiction, which was first raised before the Tax Court by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) and is asserted by both parties on appeal, with the Commissioner taking the laboring oar.

Following the trial in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Neonatology Assocs., P.A. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  3. Howard S. Scar and Ethel M. Scar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Domulewicz v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
  2. Tigers Eye Trading, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. SECC Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  4. Samueli v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  5. Menard, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API