Wells v. Booth
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dewey County; Hon. Raymond L. Dirroman, Judge. Action by F. E. Wells against E. A. Booth and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Ernest Blasingame appeals. (1) To point one of the opinion, Respondent cited; Owen v. Burlington, C; R. & N. Ry. Co., 11 S. D. 153, 76 N. W. 302'; Wright v. Sherman, 3 S. D. 290, 52 N W. 1093, 17 L. R. A.-792.
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P. J.
Th-is is an action for possession of personal property,- aided by claim and delivery, to recover certain *281livestock to which plaintiff asserts right to possession by reason of two chattel mortgages, signed by both defendants 'Booth and Blasingame. Blasingame asserts right to possession of the stock by reason of a contract with defendant Booth to pasture, feed, •and care for the livestock, which contract he claims to have fully performed, and that no paid of the consideration for such pasturing and care has ever been paid, and that, by virtue thereof, he is entitled to possession of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hanch v. RipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Wright v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- McGhee v. EdwardsTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Denison v. ShulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- State Bank v. LoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peyton v. NielsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932