O'BRIEN v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] In this appeal, we primarily consider the instruction a jury should receive when considering whether the elements of aggravated assault and battery are met. Appellant David Wayne O'Brien contends that the trial court improperly defined the term "recklessly under cireumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life." We agree that this language requires that the State prove that a defendant's conduct exhibited more than recklessness, but we determine that sufficient evidence supported O'Brien's conviction on one count of aggravated assault and battery…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Adebowale Oluseyi Adekale A/K/A Ted AdekaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Belden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.