Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. McBride v. Halliburton Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 24, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2005-0828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a qui tam action brought by Julie McBride, the relator, against Halliburton Company and other corporate defendants, including the company relator worked for, Services Employees International, Inc. The defendants, collectively called “KBR,” provided support services to the military in Iraq. Relator worked as a Morale, Welfare and Recreation (“MWR”) director, and claims, inter alia, that KBR “inflated headcounts (collected via ‘situation reports,’ commonly referred to as ‘Sit Reps’) documenting usage of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Dan E. Moldea v. New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
  5. Coles v. PerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trask v. Olin Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. American Municipal Power, Inc. v. Voith Hydro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  3. Coventry Capital US LLC v. EEA Life Settlements, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API